Democracy and economic growth a changing relationship dynamics

democracy and economic growth a changing relationship dynamics

I examine the mutual relation between political regimes and economic development. An analysis of regime dynamics shows that while the paths to democracy are varied, once democracies, we will conclude that economic growth is faster under . transformations lies in economic evolution, cultural change, the rise of civil. Should we view regime-change as a development policy? Some argue, with an eye towards the East Asian NICs, that economic growth is most .. For this reason, we expect that the vote-seeking dynamic of multiparty democracy will lead. successful process of economic development than an electoral democracy such development that leads to sustainable environmental change and resource .. the dynamics created for majoritarian governments by the political calculus of . conclusion is that the relationship between democracy and economic growth is.

Does democracy boost economic growth? | World Economic Forum

Currently, one prominent modernization theory is the Human Development Sequence. It proposes that cultural values mediate the effect that economic development has on democratisation [20][27] — [29]. The sequence describes a linear relation where economic progress enables change of cultural values which ultimately leads to democratisation.

democracy and economic growth a changing relationship dynamics

This theory has been disputed [19][31] — [33]and it remains an open question to what extent it can explain commonalities in the development of very different countries. More recently, Abdollahian et.

democracy and economic growth a changing relationship dynamics

They wrote down differential equations for changes in GDP, self-expressive values and democracy, based on the assumptions of the Human Development Sequence. They show that the model parameters fit the available time series data. However, these authors do not test alternative models.

democracy and economic growth a changing relationship dynamics

It is always possible to find the parameter set for a given model that best fits the data, but the important question is whether there are other plausible models that perform even better.

Here we properly account for this limitation. We do not start with a strict hypothesis about the underlying patterns in human development, but rather identify the best models that fit the available data. We adopt the novel Bayesian dynamical systems approach detailed in Ranganathan et al.

democracy and economic growth a changing relationship dynamics

We proceed as follows. We finally discuss our overall results and suggest an alternative model of human development based on our analysis. A comprehensive supplementary material includes further details of the data and additional results used to support the main conclusions.

Data We used ten different indicators in our analysis: Moreover female education measures gender equality.

The Dynamics of Democracy, Development and Cultural Values

To operationalise democracy we used two measures: Given the pattern in Figure 1, our first strategy is to control for lags of GDP in linear regressions, including a full set of country and year fixed effects.

In order to overcome any possible Nickell bias owing to lagged dependent variables, we show our results hold with GMM estimators proposed by Arellano and Bond and Hahn, Hausman and Kuersteiner The propensity score reweighted data can be seen in Figure 2. As Figure 2 shows, there is no difference in the years prior to the democratization even those years not used to predict the propensity score but the large difference in GDP in the subsequent years shows that the increase in GDP in Figure 1 is not merely an artefact of the dynamics of GDP in the years preceding a political transition.

Finally, in addition to controlling for country and year fixed effects, we use an instrumental-variables IV strategy to overcome omitted variable bias.

Capitalism and Democracy

Our identification assumption is that democratization in a country spreads to other nondemocratic countries in the same region, but does not have a direct differential impact on economic growth in these countries at least conditional on lagged levels of country and regional GDP, and various covariates that could be correlated with country-level GDP at the year, region, and initial regime level.

These IV estimates yield long-run effects quite close to our main estimates. We also re-estimate our results using a variety of other democracy measures used in the literature.

We find that when dynamics are not accounted for, the signs and significance of the coefficients vary widely. However, when lags of GDP are included as controls, all the other democracy measures yield positive coefficients.

The Dynamics of Democracy, Development and Cultural Values

In addition, the IV coefficients are much larger than the OLS coefficients compared to our measure, suggesting that we have reduced the measurement error in the democracy variable. It seems to lack even the basic mental ingredients. Such countries tend not only to have simple economies but also to lack the cultural and institutional preconditions to democracy.

democracy and economic growth a changing relationship dynamics

The answer is no. Though we do find that democratizations are associated with larger increases in GDP per capita in countries with higher levels of secondary schooling, there is no evidence that democracy is bad for economic growth in low-income economies or even in economies with low levels of schooling.

  • Associated Data

So why does democracy increase growth? Our strategy is not well-suited to disentangling particular mechanisms, but we attempt to disaggregate both dimensions of democracy and proximate determinants of growth. When we disentangle what components of democracy matter the most for growth, we find that civil liberties are what seem to be the most important.