The grave-dressing phase sees a post view of the relationship them less overall at some point which falls outside of Duck's explanation. -most intuitive and spontaneous of all love styles. fastest moving. fall in love fast. . relationships that end abruptly, a person moves or dies simply quits making development of romantic relationships: deterioration: grave-dressing symptoms of decline: . duck's deterioration phases of relationships: dyadic processes. Steve Duck (, ) suggested that the dissolution of relationships is an extended process composed of several Last comes the Grave-Dressing Phase.
You weigh your options and wonder what life will be like without your relationship and partner.
- Navigation menu
- User Comments
- AQA Psychology Relationships Paper 3
You work out an explanation for yourself and others for why the relationship broke down. You then turn to family and friends for affirmation, support, and advice.
In discussion, you will tend to blame the other partner or circumstances for the relationship ending; rarely will you focus on yourself. The Grave-Dressing Phase This is a time of coping with the relationship being over. You need to put the relationship behind you and move on. You create a rationale that is acceptable to you for why the relationship dissolved. You reinterpret events of the past in a way which soothes your feelings of guilt and loss of self-worth and identity. Some may provide previously withheld secrets to hasten the end of the relationship or help repair the relationship between them.
Grave-dressing phase The grave-dressing phase sees a post view of the relationship breakdown being established by both.
The Stages of Breaking Up | aloftyexistence
This will cover why the breakdown occurred with each person having their own account that presents themselves favourably often at the expense of the other. The rebuilding of self-esteem for future relationships occurs here to show trust and loyalty, two important qualities which are under question after breakdown. People may try to retain social credit by blaming circumstances, the other partner, people or anything except themselves.
They may also create a story that sits comfortably with themselves such as traits they found initially endearing about the partner not reinterpreted as a characteristic that contributed to the relationship breakdown.
Strengths, Weaknesses and Evaluation One strength of the theory is it has face validity as the process of breakdown occurring through phases is something most people can relate to through their own experiences.
This supports the notion of an intrapsychic phase as the model proposes. However gender differences exist and this theory could be argued to suffer from gender bias, particularly beta bias as it attempts to play down gender differences assuming the process is experienced similarly by men and women.
Argyle found women cited a lack of emotional support as the reason for breakdown while men cited an absence of fun. Kassin found further support for gender differences with women citing unhappiness and incompatibility while men blamed a lack of sex.
Women also wanted to remain friends while men preferred clean breaks. Intrapsychic stage[ edit ] Intrapsychic stage begins with one partner who is dissatisfied and secretively searches for a way to "fix" the relationship.
Interpersonal communication relationship dissolution
Vaughan states that uncoupling begins with a secretand Duck asserts that the secret of unhappiness is kept that way through the intrapsychic stage. Dyadic stage[ edit ] Dyadic stage where the dissatisfied partner decides to fix the problem by confronting the other partner, thus entering into uncharted territory. This may not fix what is wrong and just continue to draw out the relationship until the unhappy partner becomes determined to depart, which will move the relationship into the next phase.
Social stage[ edit ] Social stage is when the partners devise their accounts of how the breakup happened and how they will present it to their social circles.
If it is in fact the end, they will cross over into the final phase of relationship dissolution.
Grave-dressing stage[ edit ] Grave-dressing stage is simply the "attempt to bury and describe the relationship" stage. Partners now create an acceptable story about their love and loss, do whatever cognitive work, including introspectionattributionrationalizationand reassessment of self and other, which is necessary in order to get over the deceased relationship.
Interpersonal communication relationship dissolution - Wikipedia
Modification of Duck's Stage Model[ edit ] Stephanie Rollie and Steve Duck subsequently modified the original model after a critique of stage models that appear to suppose an orderly and relatively conscious progression through the above stages. Proposing instead five phases of breakdown, Rollie and Duck added a Resurrection Phase which was placed after "Grave Dressing" and represented the period of reconfiguration of self and preparation for new relationships.
In the modified proposal, the authors articulated changes to communication patterns and topics that would typify each phase, but clarified that the result of the communication could at any time be not simply progression to the next phase of break up but reversion to an earlier state of the relationship.
Experience[ edit ] Harvey explains that when you experience a loss or a depletion of resources, you may need some time to sort out what you had in the first place, what was given up in the breakup, and what remains for you to rely on, cherish or use. Grief is not a passive experience but a series of active choices for the grieving person to confront and resolve in either the direction of healing or prolonged suffering Neeld, Four central tasks of grief[ edit ] Weber outlines the following central tasks for dealing with grief.